Skip to main content

The Netflix Documentary Diet

I see Netflix documentaries as 'teachable' moments, but likely not for the reason that most would presume. I use Netflix documentaries to teach skepticism. Often, I have friends or acquaintances ask me if I saw "XYZ" documentary on Netflix, and how it inspired them to make "ABC" lifestyle change (which may or may not have been meaningful). When they ask me what I think of it, my response is usually "You should follow a Netflix documentary diet, where you only eat things that are Netflix documentary approved". This tends to get me a puzzled look, to which I respond, "think about it - follow a diet that complies only with those foods that every Netflix documentary says is okay and let me know how that turns out". At this point, the other individual usually giggles and gets my point: if you take Netflix documentaries about food as fact, you'll be left eating gusts of wind for breakfast lunch and dinner. OKAY - I'm being a bit hyperbolic - I'm sure there's an organic, non-gmo, non-domesticated weed that you could juice for a while before you got beriberi. Let's take a look at what a Netflix documentary diet would consist of:

GMO OMG - This documentary "follows one family's struggle to live and eat without participating in an unhealthy, unjust, and destructive food system." Similar messages are seen from movies like, "The Future of Food".



Food Inc - Food Inc works to expose the 'horrors' of industrialized agriculture and paints a pretty picture of small, local, organic farms. Quite similar to Fresh.





SuperSize Me - This one follows Morgan Spurlock as he only eats McDonald's food for 3 meals/day, and the health effects this has on his health.  


Forks Over Knives - FOK focuses on the benefits of a whole foods, plant-based diet (essentially a vegan diet). It features notable vegan/plant-based promoters like Esselstyn and Campbell.  This one is quite similar to Vegucated.



Food Matters - This one focuses on 'orthomolecular' medicine and features a number of 'nutritionists' and naturopaths. It speaks highly of the Gerson therapy, laments how we've 'depleted' the soil of its nutrients, the benefits of consuming organic, raw foods and is quite pro-supplementation. Although not on Netflix, this one is quite similar to Simply Raw: Reversing Diabetes in 30 Days, which highlights the benefits of a vegan diet (like in Forks over Knives) as long as it is raw. 



FedUp - FedUp was one of the more recent documentaries. Apart from its critiques about the food industry and industry-funded research(ers), it focuses mostly on the dietary evils of sugar, with some notable low-carb folks/fructose alarmists. One can be sure that the new documentary Sugar Coated will beat the same drum.



FatHead - This documentary is in response to SuperSizeMe, filmed by Tom Naughton. Naughton eats a low-carbohydrate fast food diet (mostly food from McDonald's). Naughton has a lot of disdain for low fat recommendations, and espouses a low-carbohydrate diet for health. Contrary to SuperSizeMe, Naughton loses weight and improves many biomarkers during his fast food diet. 



Fat, Sick and Nearly Dead - This one follows Joe Cross, as he goes on a 60-day juice fast across the country. It, again, espouses the benefits of a plant-based diet (he is advised by Joel Fuhrman) but also the wonders of juicing. 


 So looking at all of these, if a person wanted to lose weight and get healthier, they would start off with a plant-based, animal product free diet, that is also quite low in carbohydrates, fat, and animal protein (silken tofu it is then!) and primarily made up of organic, non-GMO vegetable juices (remember, not fruit because quickly absorbed sugars are bad), sourced from locally produced crops. Sadly, I didn't even cover all of the food documentaries out there. There's some non-Netflix ones out there, like CerealKillers and PerfectHumanDiet, which espouse the benefits of low-carbohydrate and Paleo diets. If we threw diet books in, I'm sure we'd get even fewer foods to eat. I wonder why consumers are confused about what to eat? 

Be skeptical of what you watch/read online about food and nutrition. Inspire others to be skeptical of these documentaries as well. Netflix documentaries are anything but peer reviewed. Most importantly, get your diet advice from a physician and registered dietitian, and find what works for you.  

Comments

  1. Thanks for sharing your perspective. The Michigan Ag Council promoted the Farmland film that features six young farmers/ranchers from throughout the U.S. Diverse food choices in America's food system start by decisions made on farms. Farmland discusses the choices of people who grow and raise food for your local grocery stores.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Elaine! I actually recently saw it and liked the attempt to try to both show sides!

      Delete
  2. Great post! I'm so glad to have found your blog. Enjoy reading your articles very much.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Have you seen the netflix documentary Cowspiracy?

    Also, is there ANY nutrition documentary you'd recommend that does a good job of teaching the current scientific understanding of nutrition, obesity, cholesterol, etc?

    It'd be nice to see one that draws from, what I consider balanced, sensible researchers: Chris Masterjohn for all things cholesterol, Stephan Guyenet for obesity, Alan Aragon for fitness, Monica Reinagel for nutrition, etc, etc

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beware the Meta-Analysis: Fat, Guidelines, and Biases

Headlines were abuzz this week, reporting that a new review of randomized controlled trials at the time of the low-fat guidelines didn't support their institution. Time , Business Insider , and The Verge all covered the topic with sensationalist headlines (e.g. 'We should never have told people to stop eating fat' #weneverdid). I won't spend every part of this blog picking apart the entire meta-analysis; you can read it over at the open access journal, BMJ Open Heart (1) -- (note, for myself, i'm adding an extra level of skepticism for anything that gets published in this journal). I'm also not going to defend low-fat diets either, but rather, use this meta-analysis to point out some critical shortcomings in nutritional sciences research, and note that we should be wary of meta-analyses when it comes to diet trials. First off, let's discuss randomized controlled trials (RCTs). They are considered the gold standard in biomedical research; in the hierarc...

On PURE

The PURE macronutrients studies were published in the Lancet journals today and the headlines / commentaries are reminding us that everything we thought we think we were told we knew about nutrition is wrong/misguided, etc. Below is my non-epidemiologist's run down of what happened in PURE. A couple papers came out related to PURE, but the one causing the most buzz is the relationship of the macronutrients to mortality. With a median follow up of 7.4 years, 5796 people died and 4784 had a major cardiovascular event (stroke, MCI). The paper modeled the impacts of self reported dietary carbohydrate, total fat, protein, monounsaturated (MUFA), saturated (SFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acid intakes on cardiovascular (CVD), non-CVD and total mortality; all macros were represented as a percentage of total self reported energy intakes and reported/analyzed in quintiles (energy intakes between 500-5000kcals/day were considered plausible..). All dietary data was determined by a ...

The Singling Out of Golden Rice

I saw earlier today that  Steven Novella, MD, over at Neurlogica blog  covered some controversy surrounding Golden Rice and it reminded me I had some thoughts to throw down about the GR issue. Dr Novella's post was in response to some of the claims made in a comment written on his post about a recent Nature Biotechnology paper on crop biofortification .  This is an area I've seen a lot of commentary on, no doubt because Golden Rice is a transgenic crop. Dr Novella makes some good commentary in his post and I suggest reading it ( here ) before the rest of this post - it will contain some additional thoughts to Dr Novella's. Dr Novella did a great job fielding the opposition to Golden Rice, which is something I've always found rather odd - I guess if you're vehemently opposed to a technology that represents a diverse array of methods (there's not one way to genetically engineer a plant) and innumerable potential outcomes (plants can be engineered for any number ...