Skip to main content

(Brief) Timeline of Specific Hominid Eating Patterns/Tools

Also included in the aforementioned powerpoint presentation that I did was a generalized overview of the hominid diet across the ages. Instead of parsing through the really long post on that, this will be a good review - and contains a bit more temporal data and tool use:

  • Primates – folivorous, frugivorous, insectivores, exudates
  • Australopithecines – 2-4 mya – Similar to primates – bipedal – more humanlike teeth – no evidence of tools- Robustus/bosei- started to include more roots/nuts/seeds/harder to chew foods
  • Homo Habilis – 2.3 mya -first to include scavenged meats/eggs in diet – leap in brain size from Robustus/bosei – tool use – flakes and chopping tools
  • Homo Erectus – first species to leave Africa- 2 mya – much more advanced tool use – use of fire – evidence of cannibalism – potentially hunted small animals
  • Homo Heidelbergensis – descendent of erectus – first hominid to truly hunt large game – brain size getting close to humans – improved tools and subsistence techniques
  • Homo Neanderthalensis – 200,000 years ago until 30,000 years ago – burial – shelter – hunted bears/mammoths/mastodons – controlled use of fire – clothing – larger brain cc than modern humans – distinct skeletal morphology – very high bmr, originally thought to have all meat diet – new evidence points to cooked plant/starchy foods, as well foods with bitter taste  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beware the Meta-Analysis: Fat, Guidelines, and Biases

Headlines were abuzz this week, reporting that a new review of randomized controlled trials at the time of the low-fat guidelines didn't support their institution. Time , Business Insider , and The Verge all covered the topic with sensationalist headlines (e.g. 'We should never have told people to stop eating fat' #weneverdid). I won't spend every part of this blog picking apart the entire meta-analysis; you can read it over at the open access journal, BMJ Open Heart (1) -- (note, for myself, i'm adding an extra level of skepticism for anything that gets published in this journal). I'm also not going to defend low-fat diets either, but rather, use this meta-analysis to point out some critical shortcomings in nutritional sciences research, and note that we should be wary of meta-analyses when it comes to diet trials. First off, let's discuss randomized controlled trials (RCTs). They are considered the gold standard in biomedical research; in the hierarc...

On PURE

The PURE macronutrients studies were published in the Lancet journals today and the headlines / commentaries are reminding us that everything we thought we think we were told we knew about nutrition is wrong/misguided, etc. Below is my non-epidemiologist's run down of what happened in PURE. A couple papers came out related to PURE, but the one causing the most buzz is the relationship of the macronutrients to mortality. With a median follow up of 7.4 years, 5796 people died and 4784 had a major cardiovascular event (stroke, MCI). The paper modeled the impacts of self reported dietary carbohydrate, total fat, protein, monounsaturated (MUFA), saturated (SFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acid intakes on cardiovascular (CVD), non-CVD and total mortality; all macros were represented as a percentage of total self reported energy intakes and reported/analyzed in quintiles (energy intakes between 500-5000kcals/day were considered plausible..). All dietary data was determined by a ...

The Singling Out of Golden Rice

I saw earlier today that  Steven Novella, MD, over at Neurlogica blog  covered some controversy surrounding Golden Rice and it reminded me I had some thoughts to throw down about the GR issue. Dr Novella's post was in response to some of the claims made in a comment written on his post about a recent Nature Biotechnology paper on crop biofortification .  This is an area I've seen a lot of commentary on, no doubt because Golden Rice is a transgenic crop. Dr Novella makes some good commentary in his post and I suggest reading it ( here ) before the rest of this post - it will contain some additional thoughts to Dr Novella's. Dr Novella did a great job fielding the opposition to Golden Rice, which is something I've always found rather odd - I guess if you're vehemently opposed to a technology that represents a diverse array of methods (there's not one way to genetically engineer a plant) and innumerable potential outcomes (plants can be engineered for any number ...