Skip to main content

Common Fatty Acids and their Effects

Fatty Acids Cheat-Sheet:

Saturated:
Long Chain

 
Palmitic - primary saturated fatty acid in most diets - high in beef or pork fat but low in vegetable oils - increases LDL and HDL, little effect on the ratio of Total Cholesterol to HDL


Stearic - primarily found in beef or pork fat and in small amounts in vegetable oils - does not increase LDL - believed to be rapidly converted to a monounsaturated fatty acid after absorption 

Medium Chain (don't require carnitine to cross mitochondrial membrane - more likely to be used as an energy substrate than for storage)


Lauric - greatly increases total cholesterol, moreso increasing HDL than LDL

Myristic - increases serum total cholesterol, both LDL/HDL - not a large % of fatty acid intake - doesn't effect TC:HDL much

Short Chain
butyric, propanoic acid - not generally found in the human diet, except from fermentation of fibers in the gut  - potential preventative role in colon cancer

Monounsaturated:
contains 1 cis double bond - shown to lower LDL cholesterol and leaves HDL unchanged


ω−7 (non-essential)
Palmitoleic - minor fatty acid in the diet - major source is macadamia nuts - mixed data for cholesterol effects - depends on current cholesterol status, whether it is ingested in the diet or endogenously produced - of little concern with low intakes


Vaccenic - precursor to conjugated linoleic acid - potential heart health benefits - isomer of oleic acid - trans fatty acid


ω−9 (non-essential)
Oleic - lowers LDL - large constituent of 'Mediterranean diets' (olive oil)- thought to be antiatherogenic -


Polyunsaturated:
ω−3
A-Linolenic (ALA) - essential fatty acid - precursor to EPA and DHA - similar effect on cholesterol levels as monounsaturated fats - also shown to inhibit vascular inflammation - found in plant foods, such as flax/chia/hemp/soy


Stearidonic (SDA) - more efficiently converted to EPA than ALA is - not a large part of the diet, found in fish oils and non common plant sources like echium - current studies show little effect on TC, HDL, LDL or TGs - shown to alter lipogenic gene expression and reduce expression of CRP - soy is currently being genetically modified to produce SDA from its ALA


Eicosapentaenoic (EPA) - precursor to DHA - substantially lowers triglycerides levels when consumed alongside DHA, at least 2g/day - Isolated EPA not shown to increase LDL


Docosahexaenoic (DHA) - increases HDL slightly more than EPA, most isolated trials show increases in LDL cholesterol - significant decreases in serum TGs >2g/day


ω−6
Linoleic
- essential fatty acid - precursor to Arachidonic Acid, substrate for prostaglandins and thromboxanes - lowers LDL cholesterol- low, if any effect, on HDL


Gamma-Linolenic - significantly decreases plasma TGs, increases HDL - shown to reduce serum thromboxane and potentially increase vascular prostacyclin production - said to be anti-atherogenic - found in borage and primrose oils

Trans:
produced from the hydrogenation of unsaturated cis fatty acids - most unsat cis fatty acids become saturated but a fraction is converted into trans fatty acids - shown to raise LDL and lower HDL compared to other fatty acids
Some occur naturally, like conjugated linoleic acid, and don't appear to be atherogenic

References:
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/77/5/1146.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7695873
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/60/6/986S.abstract
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/H09-079#.UlyX8SSpY7A
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejlt.201100187/pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15983523
http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/10443051
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/53/5/1230.abstract
http://jn.nutrition.org/content/134/11/2991
Whelan et al, Effects of Dietary Stearidonic Acid on Biomarkers of Lipid Metabolism, 2012. The Journal of Nutrition
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/71/5/1085.full
http://www.lipidjournal.com/article/S1933-2874%2811%2900745-8/abstract
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/53/3/660.short
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7846101

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beware the Meta-Analysis: Fat, Guidelines, and Biases

Headlines were abuzz this week, reporting that a new review of randomized controlled trials at the time of the low-fat guidelines didn't support their institution. Time , Business Insider , and The Verge all covered the topic with sensationalist headlines (e.g. 'We should never have told people to stop eating fat' #weneverdid). I won't spend every part of this blog picking apart the entire meta-analysis; you can read it over at the open access journal, BMJ Open Heart (1) -- (note, for myself, i'm adding an extra level of skepticism for anything that gets published in this journal). I'm also not going to defend low-fat diets either, but rather, use this meta-analysis to point out some critical shortcomings in nutritional sciences research, and note that we should be wary of meta-analyses when it comes to diet trials. First off, let's discuss randomized controlled trials (RCTs). They are considered the gold standard in biomedical research; in the hierarc

On PURE

The PURE macronutrients studies were published in the Lancet journals today and the headlines / commentaries are reminding us that everything we thought we think we were told we knew about nutrition is wrong/misguided, etc. Below is my non-epidemiologist's run down of what happened in PURE. A couple papers came out related to PURE, but the one causing the most buzz is the relationship of the macronutrients to mortality. With a median follow up of 7.4 years, 5796 people died and 4784 had a major cardiovascular event (stroke, MCI). The paper modeled the impacts of self reported dietary carbohydrate, total fat, protein, monounsaturated (MUFA), saturated (SFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acid intakes on cardiovascular (CVD), non-CVD and total mortality; all macros were represented as a percentage of total self reported energy intakes and reported/analyzed in quintiles (energy intakes between 500-5000kcals/day were considered plausible..). All dietary data was determined by a

Nutrition Recommendations Constantly Change...Don't They?

I was on Facebook the other day, and someone in a group I'm in made a statement about not being sure whether to eat dairy, because "one week its bad, and the next its good". This is something I hear all too often from people: nutrition is complex, confusing, and constantly changing. One week 'X' is bad, the next 'X' is good. From an outsider's perspective, nutrition seems like a battlefield - low fat vs low carb vs Mediterranean vs Paleo vs Veg*n. Google any of these diets and you'll find plenty of websites saying that the government advice is wrong and they've got the perfect diet, the solution to all of your chronic woes, guarantee'ing weight loss, muscle growth, longevity, etc. Basically, if you've got an ailment, 'X' diet is the cure. I can certainly see this as being overwhelming from a non-scientist/dietitian perspective. Nutrition is confusing...right? Screenshot, DGA: 1980, health.gov From an insider's pe